This newsletter is a free service to the North American not-for-profit community from William Harper Associates. Its focus, like everything we do, is on helping organizations that do good, do better!
Share your thoughts with me and our community.
Please, pay it forward, and forward to a friend in the sector.
Manage your newsletter subscription preferences. If you are "just visiting" this newsletter (that is, sent by a friend) you are welcome to subscribe directly.
When does outsourcing make sense? How do we identify strong candidates for outsourcing without going through detailed analyses of every function? Well, the thorough analysis still has to happen, of course, but we present here 5 red flags that may signal that outsourcing should be considered. These signs may be the evidence you need to invest some time in those analyses, and see what benefits outsourcing may hold.
But first, what do we mean by outsourcing? If we run a photocopying job down to the neighbourhood printer instead of lining up in-house, is that outsourcing? Well, outsourcing does imply the involvement of an outside supplier, but usually we think of outsourcing as spanning an entire set of activities, rather than a single transaction. And, usually, outsourcing involves ceding some control over activities to partners which do that activity as a main part of their business. So, that single photocopy job may not be outsourcing for our purposes, but getting rid of your photocopier, and having the neighbourhood printer do ALL of your photocopying, qualifies.
RED FLAG #1 – Management Spread Too Thin
Does every day seem to be jam packed with minutae? Do you have so many different things on your plate, that you can't spend any real time with any one of them? Are there things that you feel could be done by somebody else, but there isn't anybody else in your organization to do them? Outsourcing could spell relief.
Take a look at what's in your in-basket. How many of those things are on your top-3 priority list for this week or this month? (you DO have a priority list, don't you?) Seriously, whether you have a list or not, sort through your work and set out the things that just seem to be removed from the strategic issues you are trying to deal with - the things that, while important, just won't change your organization's future, however well they are done. Important, time-sensitive, but not strategic.
RED FLAG #2 – Many Suppliers
Look at who your organization works with to accomplish its work. How many suppliers and others need to deliver flawlessly in order to make things go smoothly? Think how much simpler an activity might be if only one supplier were involved from beginning to end.
If there are multiple hand-offs of work, either between suppliers, or worse, back and forth between your organization and others, that process is bound to be slower, riskier, and less efficient than it could be. Ask yourself, is each individual supplier actually adding a uniquely important value to the process? If not, it's probably time to consolidate responsibilities into fewer suppliers. Multiple benefits can be achieved by doing so: less hand-off of work from one to another; more business for the supplier makes you a more important (and valuable) customer; and, most important, your people have fewer partners to deal with, trouble shoot and generally manage.
RED FLAG #3 - Fluctuating Transaction Volumes
Do you have processes that generate huge volumes of work at certain times of the week, month or year? Do you pay overtime, hire temps, or bring in hordes of volunteers to cope? Maybe you should just let someone else cope! After all, a big peak to you might be nothing to a larger organization that does this type of work all the time. Or, it might just mesh with a big valley in someone else's operations.
Maybe it's a membership renewal, major fundraising event, or annual drive that gives rise to the peak volume. Whatever the activity, there are organizations that make it their business to do that kind of work for others. To do so, they build the processes (including using scalable technology) to handle enormous (to you) transaction volumes for many clients. They may just take away a headache or two as well!
RED FLAG #4 – Well Defined Tasks
If you've got routine administrative activities in your organization, you've probably thought that it would be nice to automate some of them. But, who can take the time, and spend the money, to search out, evaluate, select, implement and manage information technology projects? Well, the answer is that someone can, and already has. And, what that means is that they may be in a position to do your work, profitably for them, but still cost-effectively for you.
If you can define and clearly articulate all the specific processes and business rules around a particular activity within your organization, you've gone a long way toward being able to outsource it cost-effectively. And, if those processes and rules are not particularly unique to your organization, odds are that someone else is already running efficient processes that could be readily adapted to fill your needs.
RED FLAG #5 - Whose Core Competency?
OK, “core competency” is a buzzword. But, it captures the essence of this issue: is the activity that you're looking at really the business that you are in? Is it one of the things that only your organization can do, that defines what you are all about? If so, by all means, hang onto it!
But if not, find someone who is in that business – they can likely do it faster, better, cheaper than you can, and they will be itching to do so! As noted above, if someone else can do the work for you at a profit, and still be cost-effective for you, that's win-win.
Conclusion
When one or more of these red flags is spotted, it is probably time to have a look. While it can be difficult to even contemplate taking on the work of evaluating options, the benefits can be significant, and the positives can outweigh this extra work very quickly. An objective, external evaluation of those options may be the best approach, both in terms of not stretching existing management resources, and of not colouring the results by being immersed in the status quo. The costs of an external review can be recouped very quickly in many cases.
Outsourcing has potentially significant benefits for your organization. Can you afford not to have outsourcing in your arsenal?
Don't forget to browse our newsletter archive for access to over 100 great articles, news items and resources on the sector. Simply click on the link at the top of this page to find a comprehensive index of materials on the site. The index is updated regularly, and includes not only actual subject title, but also keywords.
Last month's Newsletter included the following items. If you missed any of them, click here:
Do you check every incoming invoice to see if your supplier offers a discount for prompt payment? You should.
In order to alleviate the burden (and uncertainty) of collecting long-outstanding accounts receivable, many companies will offer a discount for fast payment. And, these discounts can be significant. Even where they don't look like a big savings, they often are. For example, a savings of 2% of the invoice amount, in return for paying in 10 days rather than 30 (known as “2/10, net/30”) translates into an annualized interest rate of close to 45%.
So, failing to take this discount amounts to borrowing money at something like a 45% interest rate – not a good deal by anyone's standards. Or, to put it in more positive terms, taking advantage of supplier discounts can be like investing at 45% interest, risk-free!
If you've followed the recent articles in this newsletter, you'll know that we've been working with a group of Executive Directors in the Greater Toronto Area. The focus of that work has been in helping to meet their professional needs in their unique EDs' role. That work continues, and we are looking forward to seeing a busy year of programming for this key, but under-served, group of NPO stakeholders.
But, if it's so tough being an ED, why do they do it? There are some interesting insights in a recent study understaken by Michael C. Gilbert and The Gilbert Center (http://www.gilbert.org/), based in Seattle, Washington, USA. (Michael has generously made his work freely available under a Creative Commons license – get it here.
A couple of conclusions that are bound to ring true:
“The vast majority of people who work in civil society see their job as part of their identity, compared to society at large, in which nearly half of all workers see their job as just a way to earn a living”; and
“Civil society has a greater commitment to training than society at large”.
On the other hand, “[b]arely half as many people who work in civil society are completely satisfied with their job as those who work in society at large”. Gilbert suggests that this is because workers in civil society “are substantially more demanding about the standards that would allow them to say they were completely satisfied”. While there is no doubt some truth in this assertion, to me, this underscores the lack of resourcing and support that exists for workers in our sector. And, to me, it adds all the more urgency to helping EDs support themselves.
This month's "member connections" discusses ways of honouring and recognizing your members' accomplishments.
We all like to be recognized for our accomplishments, big or small, whether we admit it or not! And, who better to recognize an individual's activity in their chosen profession, business or area of interest than the association that organizes that area?
What to recognize
The sky's the limit in terms of what events are worthy of recognition. But - and this will be a recurring theme throughout this article - moderation is the key. If every member is getting recognized for something, then the value of that recognition drops to nothing. (Worse yet, if almost every member is getting recognized, it can be a slap in the face to those who aren't!) But, there are lots of legitimate milestones, accomplishments and activities that might warrant recognition in your circumstances. Here are some of them:
How to recognize
Let your imagination run wild in recognizing your members! But, moderation (or proportionality) is the key. In particular, different types of honours must have reasonably appropriate, and proportionate, awards. Some possibilities:
Benefits
Other than being nice people, why do we honour members? There are many benefits that can be achieved, if the honours are thoughtfully designed. For example,
Risks and costs
Like most things, there are downsides to watch out for, though. A poorly designed program can lead to a number of potentially significant issues: